A High Court in London heard that Mr Wells died from a “reversible and treatable condition”.
The hospital admitted negligence over his death and apologised to the family.
Mr Wells had gone to hospital after suffering respiratory failure following a persistent cough. His life could have been saved and he could have made a full recovery had a tube been inserted in to him with which to aid his breathing.
The barrister representing Mrs Wells stated that “Mr Wells did not get the treatment he was entitled to expect. It is a matter of profound regret.”
Ms Wells was entitled to make a claim on her late husband’s behalf under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. It states that an action can be brought on the deceased’s behalf by anyone who falls within the category of a dependant.
As Mr Wells’ wife at the time of his death, Ms Wells fell within that category and was entitled to receive compensation for his injuries. It is fortunate that such a provision exists, as often where a fatal accident occurs it is not only a loss emotionally but also financially, with the deceased having provided a proportion of the income for the family. Without this it would be an even more devastating blow for those who have already suffered a considerable loss.