Why is this?
This is because it is often easy to prove that it is the other driver is at fault. The fact that another vehicle has collided with the back of yours instantly raises thoughts of speeding, not keeping a safe enough distance, distraction, or general lack of care and responsibility when driving. It is common knowledge amongst drivers that the recommended distance between vehicles is that of a car length (although this depends on the speed of the vehicles as well.)
However, distractions such as other passengers, mobile phones, fatigue or music can be crucial in terms of driving ability and distraction.
Although there are also some reasons that the defendant can use as a valid defense, they’re not acceptable:
- Weather – icy, snowy or rainy conditions heighten the chance of an accident but this is not really a credible excuse – surely you would be more attentive towards your driving in these conditions.
- The claimant suddenly braking – this is only considered acceptable if there was a child or a large enough obstruction to the road.
Still though, the general rule is that a driver that hits the back of another one is more than likely to be at fault.
Like any other injury caused by someone else’’s negligence, it is always worth giving us a call to evaluate your claim. You could be owed thousands of pounds in compensation if you are suffering at the hands of a negligent driver, and their insurance is there to cover you for a claim.